Deep learning radiomics-based prediction model of metachronous distant metastasis following curative resection for retroperitoneal leiomyosarcoma: a bicentric study.

BACKGROUND: Combining conventional radiomics models with deep learning features can result in superior performance in predicting the prognosis of patients with tumors; however, this approach has never been evaluated for the prediction of metachronous distant metastasis (MDM) among patients with retroperitoneal leiomyosarcoma (RLS). Thus, the purpose of this study was to develop and validate a preoperative contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT)-based deep learning radiomics model for predicting the occurrence of MDM in patients with RLS undergoing complete surgical resection. METHODS: A total of 179 patients who had undergone surgery for the treatment of histologically confirmed RLS were retrospectively recruited from two tertiary sarcoma centers. Semantic segmentation features derived from a convolutional neural network deep learning model as well as conventional hand-crafted radiomics features were extracted from preoperative three-phase CECT images to quantify the sarcoma phenotypes. A conventional radiomics signature (RS) and a deep learning radiomics signature (DLRS) that incorporated hand-crafted radiomics and deep learning features were developed to predict the risk of MDM. Additionally, a deep learning radiomics nomogram (DLRN) was established to evaluate the incremental prognostic significance of the DLRS in combination with clinico-radiological predictors. RESULTS: The comparison of the area under the curve (AUC) values in the external validation set, as determined by the DeLong test, demonstrated that the integrated DLRN, DLRS, and RS models all exhibited superior predictive performance compared with that of the clinical model (AUC 0.786 [95% confidence interval 0.649-0.923] vs. 0.822 [0.692-0.952] vs. 0.733 [0.573-0.892] vs. 0.511 [0.359-0.662]; both P < 0.05). The decision curve analyses graphically indicated that utilizing the DLRN for risk stratification provided greater net benefits than those achieved using the DLRS, RS and clinical models. Good alignment with the calibration curve indicated that the DLRN also exhibited good performance. CONCLUSIONS: The novel CECT-based DLRN developed in this study demonstrated promising performance in the preoperative prediction of the risk of MDM following curative resection in patients with RLS. The DLRN, which outperformed the other three models, could provide valuable information for predicting surgical efficacy and tailoring individualized treatment plans in this patient population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not applicable.

Radical resection and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in the treatment of high risk recurrent retroperitoneal sarcoma-A pilot study in a tertiary Asian centre.

BACKGROUND: Peritoneal sarcomatosis (PS) is a difficult entity to treat with limited options and guarded prognosis. We aimed to determine if the addition of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) could offer superior local recurrence-free survival in patients with retroperitoneal sarcoma at high risk of developing PS as opposed to extended resection alone. METHODS: This is a single arm, phase II intervention study where all patients with recurrent localized retroperitoneal sarcoma considered at high risk of developing PS were considered for enrolment (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03792867). Upon enrolment, patients underwent vigorous preoperative testing to ensure fitness for the procedure. During surgery, patients underwent extended resection and HIPEC with doxorubicin. Patients were followed-up every 2 weeks (± 10 days) for the first month and subsequently every three months (± 1 month) up to a year post-surgery, and were assessed for potential chemotherapy toxicity and post-treatment complications. After a year from resection and HIPEC, patients were followed-up either during routine clinic review or contacted via telephone every year (± 1 month) for 3 years. RESULTS: Six patients were recruited but one patient dropped out due to adverse and unexpected intraoperative events. The remaining patients completed the procedure uneventfully. Post-HIPEC, all patients recurred with a disease-free interval ranging from six to 24 months. Three patients died due to complications from recurrent disease whereas the remaining three patients are alive as of their last visit. The overall survival at time at reporting ranged between 22 to 56 months. CONCLUSION: The procedure is feasible with no major morbidity to patients. However, we are unable to recommend for it to be implemented as a routine procedure at this current stage due to lack of improved survival outcomes. Further multi-institutional studies may be conducted to yield better results.

Recurrence of locally invasive retroperitoneal dedifferentiated liposarcoma shortly after surgery: A case report and literature review.

RATIONALE: Retroperitoneal dedifferentiated liposarcoma (RPDDL) is an uncommon malignancy, which often remains undetected for many years due to having adequate space in the retroperitoneal cavity and lacking clinical manifestations in the early stage of the disease. Surgical procedure is usually used as the first choice for treatment. However, it is prone to local recurrence after the operation, resulting in an unfavorable prognosis. Our aim is to draw useful lessons from the new case and provide some experience for management of the disease. PATIENT CONCERNS: We describe a 55-year-old male patient who was admitted for a 3-week history of persistent dull ache of the left waist. A large mass of the left upper abdomen was palpated in physical examination. Moreover, the imaging examination revealed that the diameter of the mass was about 21 cm, and some adjacent vital organs were invaded, which brought great challenges to complete surgical resection. DIAGNOSIS: The postoperative pathological results confirmed that the mass was RPDDL with invasion of the surrounding vital structures including pancreas, spleen, left adrenal gland, left kidney, and vasculature with tumor emboli. INTERVENTIONS: Surgical resection of the mass was performed by our multidisciplinary team. The patient received chemotherapy 1 month after surgery. OUTCOMES: The effect of chemotherapy seemed to be unsatisfactory. Local multifocal recurrence of the tumor was considered about 2 months after surgery. Finally, he gave up any treatments and died of the disease. LESSONS: Regular physical examination and ultrasound screening may detect the disease as early as possible, especially for high-risk group aged 60 to 70, which should be popularized. Incomplete resection, vascular invasion, and interruption of postoperative treatment may lead to an unfavorable prognosis. Therefore, we think that patients with the disease may benefit from complete surgical resection and uninterrupted adjuvant therapy.

Radiation therapy for retroperitoneal sarcoma: practice patterns in North America.

BACKGROUND: The addition of radiation therapy (RT) to surgery in retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) remains controversial. We examined practice patterns in the use of RT for patients with RPS over time in a large, national cohort. METHODS: Patients in the National Cancer Database (2004-2017) who underwent resection of RPS were included. Trends over time for proportions were calculated using contingency tables with Cochran-Armitage Trend test. RESULTS: Of 7,485 patients who underwent resection, 1,821 (24.3%) received RT (adjuvant: 59.9%, neoadjuvant: 40.1%). The use of RT decreased annually by < 1% (p = 0.0178). There was an average annual increase of neoadjuvant RT by 13% compared to an average annual decrease of adjuvant RT by 6% (p < 0.0001). Treatment at high-volume centers (OR 14.795, p < 0.0001) and tumor > 10 cm (OR 2.009, p = 0.001) were associated with neoadjuvant RT. In contrast liposarcomas (OR 0.574, p = 0.001) were associated with adjuvant RT. There was no statistically significant difference in overall survival between patients treated with surgery alone versus surgery and RT (p = 0.07). CONCLUSION: In the United States, the use of RT for RPS has decreased over time, with a shift towards neoadjuvant RT. However, a large percentage of patients are still receiving adjuvant RT and this mostly occurs at low-volume hospitals.

Progress in Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Management: Surgical and Radiotherapy Approaches.

Surgical resection is the cornerstone of curative treatment for retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS), aiming for complete excision, yet the complexity of RPS with its proximity to vital structures continues to lead to high local recurrence rates after surgery alone. Thus, the role of radiotherapy (RT) continues to be refined to improve local control, which remains an important goal to prevent RPS recurrence. The recently completed global randomized trial to evaluate the role of surgery with and without preoperative RT - STRASS1, did not demonstrate a significant overall benefit for neoadjuvant RT based on the pre-specified definition of abdominal recurrence-free survival, however, sensitivity analysis using a standard definition of local recurrence and analysis of outcomes by compliance to the RT protocol suggests histology-specific benefit in well- and some de-differentiated liposarcomas. Ultimately, multidisciplinary collaboration and personalized approaches that consider histological sarcoma types and patient-specific factors are imperative for optimizing the therapeutic strategy in the management of RPS.

Comparing Multivisceral Resection with Tumor-only Resection of Liposarcoma Using the Win Ratio.

BACKGROUND: Multivisceral resection of retroperitoneal liposarcoma (LPS) is associated with increased morbidity and may not confer a survival benefit compared with tumor-only (TO) resection. We compared both approaches using a novel statistical method called the "win ratio" (WR). METHODS: Patients who underwent resection of LPS from 2004 to 2015 were identified from the National Cancer Database. Multivisceral resection was defined as removal of the primary site in addition to other organs. The WR was calculated based on a hierarchy of postoperative outcomes: 30-day and 90-day mortality, long-term survival, and severe complication. RESULTS: Among 958 patients (multivisceral 634, TO 324) who underwent resection, the median age was 63 years (interquartile range [IQR] 54-71) with a median follow-up of 51 months (IQR 30-86). There was no difference in the WR among patients who underwent TO versus multivisceral resection in the matched cohort (WR 0.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.61-1.10). In patients aged 72-90 years, those who underwent multivisceral resection had 36% lower odds of winning compared with patients undergoing TO resection (WR 0.64, 95% CI 0.40-0.98). A subgroup analysis of patients classified as not having adjacent tumor involvement at the time of surgery revealed that those patients who underwent multivisceral resection had 33% lower odds of winning compared to TO resection (WR 0.67, 95% CI 0.45-0.99). CONCLUSIONS: Based on win-ratio assessments of a hierarchical composite endpoint, multivisceral resection in patients without adjacent tumor involvement may not confer improved outcomes. This method supports the rationale for less invasive resection of LPS in select patients, especially older patients.

Percutaneous Microwave Ablation for Treatment of Retroperitoneal Tumors.

Purpose To determine if microwave ablation (MWA) of retroperitoneal tumors can safely provide high rates of local tumor control. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included 19 patients (median age, 65 years [range = 46-78 years]; 13 [68.4%] men and six [31.6%] women) with 29 retroperitoneal tumors treated over 22 MWA procedures. Hydrodissection (0.9% saline with 2% iohexol) was injected in 17 of 22 (77.3%) procedures to protect nontarget anatomy. The primary outcomes evaluated were local tumor progression (LTP) and complication rates. Oncologic outcomes, including overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and treatment-free interval (TFI), were examined as secondary outcome measures. Results Median follow-up was 18 months (range = 0.5-113). Hydrodissection was successful in displacing nontarget anatomy in 16 of 17 (94.1%) procedures. The LTP rate was 3.4% (one of 29; 95% CI: 0.1, 17.8) per tumor and 5.3% (one of 19; 95% CI: 0.1, 26.0) per patient. The overall complication rate per patient was 15.8% (three of 19), including two minor complications and one major complication. The OS rate at 1, 2, and 3 years was 81.8%, 81.8%, and 72.7%, respectively, with a median OS estimated at greater than 7 years. There was no evidence of a difference in OS (P = .34) and PFS (P = .56) between patients with renal cell carcinoma (six of 19 [31.6%]) versus other tumors (13 of 19 [68.4%]) and patients treated with no evidence of disease (15 of 22 [68.2%]) versus patients with residual tumors (seven of 22 [31.8%]). Median TFI was 18 months (range = 0.5-108). Conclusion Treatment of retroperitoneal tumors with MWA combined with hydrodissection provided high rates of local control, prolonged systemic therapy-free intervals, and few serious complications. Keywords: Ablation Techniques (ie, Radiofrequency, Thermal, Chemical), Retroperitoneum, Microwave Ablation, Hydrodissection © RSNA, 2024.

Clinical and surgical effectiveness of the multi-disciplinary standardized management model in the treatment of retroperitoneal liposarcoma: Evidence-based clinical practice experience from Fudan Zhongshan.

BACKGROUND: To assess the correlation between clinical outcomes and diagnostic accuracy of evaluations carried out by a preoperative multidisciplinary team versus standard surgical care for patients with retroperitoneal liposarcoma undergoing surgery. METHODS: This comparative study was conducted retrospectively at a specialist assessment center within Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, China, between April 2011 and March 2021. Patients were assigned to a multidisciplinary team or nonmultidisciplinary team cohort based on referral to the multidisciplinary team. The primary outcome measured was long-term clinical prognosis, with other outcomes including diagnostic accuracy, 30-day reoperation, duration of stay, perioperative mortality, and medical complications. To mitigate selection bias, we conducted propensity-score matching. Uni- and multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were then used to evaluate the effect of multidisciplinary teams on postoperative survival. The previously specified questionnaire was used to measure the enhancement of awareness and treatment adherence facilitated by multidisciplinary team management. Data analysis was carried out between January 2023 and August 2023. RESULTS: Of the 521 records that were screened, 139 patients were deemed eligible for inclusion and defined as the multidisciplinary team cohort. At the same time, 382 patients without multidisciplinary team management were also included during that period and defined as the nonmultidisciplinary team cohort. The multidisciplinary team cohort exhibited lower numbers of primary retroperitoneal liposarcoma but a higher tumor grade and a greater proportion of R2 resection. After propensity-score matching, the 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates were 89.5%, 70.5%, and 62.9%, respectively, in the multidisciplinary team cohort, and 77.1%, 49.8%, and 45.1% in the nonmultidisciplinary team cohort. The diagnostic consistency of the multidisciplinary team group was significantly superior to that of the nonmultidisciplinary cohort (92.5% vs 83.6%, P = .042). Although no significant links were shown with duration of stay (P = .232) and 30-day reoperation (P = .447), the multidisciplinary team participation was linked to a substantial decrease in perioperative mortality (P = .036) and postoperative complications (P = .002). Additionally, the multidisciplinary team group indicated stronger illness awareness and postoperative adherence among individuals with retroperitoneal liposarcoma. CONCLUSION: The study's findings indicate that multidisciplinary team management could result in improved clinical outcomes, higher diagnostic accuracy, and reduced duration of postoperative stays, complications, and perioperative mortality. The intervention may also enhance disease awareness and postoperative compliance in retroperitoneal liposarcoma patients who undergo surgery. However, evidence quality was deemed low, and prospective studies with robust designs are required. Nonetheless, these results are worth considering.

[Two Cases of Retroperitoneal Synovial Sarcoma].

We experienced two cases of renal primary synovial sarcoma. Case 1: A 29-year-old man underwent laparoscopic radical nephrectomy and was originally diagnosed with renal cell carcinoma. Case 2: A 25-year-old man was treated by open radical nephrectomy since radiographical findings indicated tumor invasion to the ureter causing hydronephrosis. Both cases were pathologically diagnosed as renal synovial sarcomas, and were followed using computed tomography. Recurrence was observed within a year in both cases.

Influence of nutritional status and body composition on postoperative events and outcome in patients treated for primary localized retroperitoneal sarcoma.

BACKGROUND: Retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS) are rare tumours of mesenchymal origin, commonly presented as a large tumour mass at time of diagnosis. We investigated the impact of body composition on outcome in patients operated on for primary localized RPS. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analysed data for all patients operated on for primary RPS at our institution between 1999 and 2020. Preoperative skeletal muscle area (SMA), visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue area (VAT and SAT) and muscle radiation attenuation (MRA) were calculated using computed tomography scans at the level of third lumbar vertebra. European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP2) criteria were applied to define myopenia. Using maximum log-rank statistic method we determined the optimal cut-off values of body composition parameters. Myosteatosis was defined based on determined MRA cut-offs. RESULTS: In total 58 patient were eligible for the study. With a median follow-up of 116 months, the estimated 5-year overall survival (OS) and local-recurrence free survival (LRFS) were 66.8% and 77.6%, respectively. Patients with myopenia had significantly lower 5-year OS compared to non-myopenic (p = 0.009). Skeletal muscle index and subcutaneous adipose tissue index predicted LRFS on univariate analysis (p = 0.052 and p = 0.039, respectively). In multivariate analysis high visceral-to-subcutaneous adipose tissue area ratio (VSR) independently predicted higher postoperative complication rate (89.2% vs. 10.8%, p = 0.008). Myosteatosis was associated with higher postoperative morbidity. CONCLUSIONS: Myopenia affected survival, but not postoperative outcome in RPS. Visceral obesity, VSR (> 0.26) and myosteatosis were associated with higher postoperative morbidity. VSR was better prognostic factor than VAT in RPS.

Retroperitoneal liposarcoma: Case of a giant tumour inside the abdomen.

Retroperitoneal liposarcomas are rare malignant tumours that often grow rapidly in size and become symptomatic lat e in t he disease course, posing diagnostic a nd therapeutic challenges. Although abdominal imaging can rel iab ly diagnose the tumour, definitive diagnosis is only p ossib le th rough bio psy af ter surgical excision , w hich remains the primary treatment modality for these tumours. Long- term sur v ival is p rimarily determ ined throu gh histologic grade and post-resection tumour margins. We report t he case of a 43-year-o ld male patient, see n at Dr Ruth KM Pfau Hospital Karachi, who under went successful surgical excision for a well-differentiated retroperitoneal liposarcoma an d had no rad io gr aphic evidence o f local recurrence at both 3 and 12-month follow-ups.

Unusual presentation of biliopancreatic cancer as primary retroperitoneal tumor.

Primary retroperitoneal tumors are little-known neoplasias and consequently, difficult to diagnose. We report an extremely unusual case of a biliopancreatic adenocarcinoma with retroperitoneal localization simulating a primary retroperitoneal tumor. As far as we know, there are no similar cases published up to date.

A systematic review of the role of chemotherapy in retroperitoneal sarcoma by the Australia and New Zealand sarcoma association clinical practice guidelines working party.

BACKGROUND: In primary localised resectable retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS), loco-regional and distant relapse occur frequently despite optimal surgical management. The role of chemotherapy in improving outcomes is unclear. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted, using the population, intervention, comparison outcome (PICO) model, to evaluate whether neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy improve outcomes in adults with primary localised resectable RPS. Medline, Embase and Cochrane Central were queried for publications from 1946 to June 2022 that evaluated recurrence free survival, overall survival, and post operative complications. Each study was screened by two independent reviewers for suitability. A qualitative synthesis of the results was performed. RESULTS: Twenty three studies were identified; one meta-analysis of retrospective studies and 22 retrospective studies including three with propensity matched cohorts. Most studies did not analyse outcomes by histology, detail treatment regimens, provide baseline characteristics or selection criteria for those receiving chemotherapy. Evidence of selection bias was illustrated in several studies. Newcastle-Ottawa quality of retrospective cohort studies was good for 12 studies and poor for 10 studies. All studies were assessed as Level III-2 evidence by the Australian NHMRC hierarchy. Overall, the addition of neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy to surgery was not associated with improvement in local recurrence, metastasis free survival, disease free survival or overall survival in primary localised resectable RPS. There is some evidence of an association of chemotherapy with worse overall survival. One single centre study showed that neoadjuvant chemotherapy was not associated with increased post operative complications compared to surgery alone in primary localised resectable RPS. CONCLUSIONS: There is currently no evidence that demonstrates the addition of chemotherapy to surgery improves outcomes in adult patients with primary localised resectable RPS. Available evidence is limited by its retrospective nature and high likelihood of selection bias with chemotherapy generally administered to patients at higher risk of recurrence and many patients not receiving care in high volume sarcoma centres. Randomised trials are required to conclusively determine the role of chemotherapy in primary localised resectable RPS.

Gender Differences in Prognosis After Primary Resection for Retroperitoneal Liposarcoma.

BACKGROUND: Current evidence regarding gender difference in retroperitoneal liposarcoma (RLPS) is scarce, so we sought to investigate whether gender may affect prognosis after primary resection of RLPS. METHODS: We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to identify RLPS patients from January 1973 to December 2015. Multivariate cox proportional hazard analysis was adopted to generate adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of survival outcomes. RESULTS: In total, 2108 RLPS patients, including 971 women and 1137 men, were identified, with a median follow-up of 45.0 (17.0-92.0) months. The 5-year and 10-year overall survival rates were 50.5% and 31.5% for men and 60.4% and 42.5% for women. The 5-year and 10-year disease-specific survival rates for men and women were 71.5%, 57.3% and 76.3%, 62.1%, respectively. We found men were associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality (AHR 1.3, 95% CI 1.0-1.6, P = .017) but not disease-specific mortality (AHR 1.2, 95% CI .9-1.6, P = .246). The subgroup analyses revealed that men were associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality in patients with low-grade tumors (AHR 1.8, 95% CI 1.3-2.5) or patients who received non-radical resection (AHR 1.6, 95% CI 1.2-2.1). In the subgroup of low-grade tumors, men were also associated with an increased risk of disease-specific mortality (AHR 2.0, 95% CI 1.2-3.3). CONCLUSION: Men may have worse survival after primary resection of RLPS compared with women, especially in patients with low-grade tumors or patients who received non-radical resection. Gender-based disparities may deserve more attention in patients with RLPS.